General Conceptual
Questions:
(1) Is there resonance in CH3CO3- anion? (I'm guessing no, but I
don't know why.)
(2) Why is it a "reflux" for KCN(alc) reactions?
A Level Questions:
2013P3Q2(b)[ii]
The answer key says "NH3 acts as a reducing agent as it reduced
HNO2 to N2, itself being oxidised to N2." It's a bit confusing to
me. Is the thing being reduced N as well? Is this a
disproportionation reaction?
2013P3Q2(d)[ii]
"Benzylamine does not decolourise reddish-brown bromine water
and does not form white ppt."
Why does it not decolourise reddish-brown bromine water? Is it
not a ring activated by a NH2 group that can have Br groups
attached to it?
2013P3Q3(c)[ii]
The answer said that "KMnO4 reacts with SO2 to form colourless
products" then proceeded to say "a permanent pale pink colur is
seen at the end-point". Is it colourless or pale pink? (Saw both
colourless and pale pink in a lot of other Qs too, very confused on
this front.)
2014P3Q5(c)[i]
Why is H2O not oxidised instead? The answer placed E value of
Ni2+/Ni instead, but E value of H2O (-0.83) is more negative than
Ni2+/Ni (-0.25)?
2014P3Q5(d)
"silver will drop to the base as anode sludge."
What is anode sludge and how does it work? Why does it not stay
at the anode? (This is very confusing for me because even though
it's a alloy with many components oxidising away gradually, I don't
see how it will just fall off? *confused face* *brings out hot tea
to calm self* Sorry if the question is kinda dumb, haha.)
_________________________________________________
Thanks :)
A Level Questions :
2013P3Q2(b)[ii] : This is not a disproportionation reaction, but a
symproportionation or comproportionation reaction. It does not
change the fact that NH3 is being oxidized and hence is the
reducing agent, and that HNO2 is being reduced and hence is the
oxidizing agent.
2013P3Q2(d)[ii] : This molecule isn't phenylamine, it is
benzylamine. The NH2 group cannot donate electrons by resonance
into the benzene ring, as it is inhibited or blocked by the sp3 C
atom, and hence resonance delocalizaton of the N atom's lone pair
to the benzene ring sp2 C atom (remember that resonance requires
sideways overlap of unhybridized p orbitals) cannot occur without
'violating' the octet of the sp3 C atom.
2013P3Q3(c)[ii] : Purple MnO4- is reduced to Mn2+, which is a very
pale pink colour, which in diluted solutions appear colorless. The
end-point is indicated by the first sighting of a permanent pink
colour (even after swirling the conical flask). This "permanent
pink colour" is *not* due to the very pale pink colour of Mn2+, but
instead is due to the last drop (from the burette) of the purple
KMnO4 which indicates the end-point has been reached, and that the
last drop is an 'extra' drop of KMnO4 in excess which doesn't react
away (since the analyte has already been fully oxidized), hence the
"permanent pink colour".
And if you're wondering "but won't that mean the volume reading
won't be accurate, since there's an 'extra' drop in excess?", then
2 things : 1stly, that single extra drop is relatively
inconsequential and negligible, compared to the other inevitable
experimental limitations : limitations of measuring instruments,
uncertainty values, human errors, systematic errors, and random
errors. 2ndly, remember that the end-point only approximates
equivalence point. We can only claim the value obtained to be the
end-point, which we can only hope (with minimal experimental error)
to be sufficiently close to the true equivalence point. Hence to
ensure reliability and reproducibility, you have to repeat the
titration several times until you obtain concordant titres.
2014P3Q5(c)[i] : Eh walau you. -_-". -0.83V is the standard
reduction potential of H2O to H2 gas. Since the standard reduction
potential of Cu2+ to Cu is +0.34V (ie. reduction potential more
positive than -0.83V the standard reduction potential of H2O to
H2), obviously Cu2+ wins and is hence reduced to Cu at the cathode
(instead of H2O being reduced to H2 gas). If you wanna compare the
standard oxidation potential of Ni to Ni2+ which is +0.25V, to the
standard oxidation potential of H2O to O2 which is -1.23V, then
obviously Ni wins (ie. oxidation potential more positive) and is
hence oxidized to Ni2+ at the anode (instead of H2O being oxidized
to O2 gas). And you can use +0.83V only if you want to oxidize H2
gas (in alkaline solution) to H2O, but wherefore cometh the H2 gas
(and the required OH-(aq) ions) in this question?
2014P3Q5(d) : "Anode sludge" is the term given for the gooey
disguisting stuff (ie. sludge) that is deposited below the anode.
Why does it fall off and drop down? Because metals are insoluble in
water *and* denser than water. Imagine you have a cake with many
small stones embedded in it. As the cake is being eaten away by
ants, won't the stones fall? As the Cu atoms in the block of impure
Cu ore rock (which is the anode) is being oxidized to *aqueous*
Cu2+ (ie. cations are soluble (unlike solid metals in atomic state)
thanks to ion - permanent dipole interactions can dissolve and
become aqueous, making the block of impure Cu ore rock which is the
anode appear to dissolve away), the less reactive (ie. less
electropositive and hence harder to oxidize) metals such as silver,
remaining as the unoxidized solid metal, and solid metals being
insoluble in water and denser than water, naturally drop down from
the impure copper block of ore rock (ie. the anode), which together
with any unreactive (organic or inorganic) material left over from
the ore rock (eg. sand, soil, etc), becomes the gooey disgusting
mess below the anode, which we call "anode sludge".